An AI-assisted migration framework
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working Playwright
Your existing enterprise test automation, the business flows, modules, validations, and data your team has built over years move across intact. A production-ready Playwright project with a Page Object Model structure, full test data, and complete coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working Playwright project with Page Object Model
Your existing enterprise test automation, the business flows, modules, validations, and data your team has built over years move across intact. A production-ready Playwright project with a Page Object Model structure, full test data, and complete coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working
Your existing enterprise test automation, the business flows, modules, validations, and data your team has built over years move across intact. A production-ready Playwright project with a Page Object Model structure, full test data, and complete coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
~40,000
Automation steps modernised
Proven at enterprise scale
90%+
Reduction in rewrite effort
Save weeks of engineering time
100%
Playwright Compatible
Modern, maintainable, future ready
Why teams are modernising
As organizations move toward CI/CD, open-source tooling, and AI-assisted testing, QA leaders are asking a practical question: how do we bring years of valuable automation forward without rebuilding everything from scratch? These are the four pressures we hear every week.
Rising License Costs
Licensing costs rise as teams scale, making open-source alternatives more attractive.
High Maintenance Effort
Frequent application changes increase manual updates and slow QA cycles
CI/CD Integration Friction
Legacy automation often needs extra effort to fit into modern CI/CD pipelines.
Talent and Flexibility Constraints
Specialist platform skills limit hiring flexibility and slow modern QA adoption.
How the pipeline works
We don't ask you to change your environment or disrupt your existing testing operations. Your automation assets are shared with us through your standard export process. Our migration pipeline reads the complete structure modules, test flows, validations, and data, and the rest happens automatically, with two human checkpoints to keep you in control at every stage.
What changes on day one
The goal of modernisation isn't novelty; it's predictable cost, engineering velocity, and an automation stack that fits the way your teams already work. Here is what actually shifts.
Before - Tosca centric
Platform-dependent automation
Test assets live inside a proprietary platform, accessible only to licensed users
Every application change requires manual updates across modules
No native CI/CD support — custom adapters to build and maintain
Per-seat licensing scales linearly with team size
Specialist hiring pool narrows every year
After - Playwright + AI
Playwright on your own infrastructure
Test suite is plain code in your own version-controlled repository
AI-assisted self-healing handles application drift; engineers review and approve
Native CI/CD — runs on every pull request like any other build
Open-source runtime with no per-seat licence dependency
Hiring pool is the entire modern QA and engineering market
A real migration, at real scale
A North American enterprise asked us to modernise their most demanding automation flow first, a multi-module Salesforce leasing test with ten chained modules and deep cross-system validation. We delivered in four weeks, with full validation parity across every step.
~40,000
Automation steps modernised
Large-scale enterprise automation converted to Playwright
10/10
Modules passing
All modules migrated and validated with complete test coverage.
4 weeks
End-to-end delivery
From migration to execution-ready Playwright tests in just four weeks.
100%
Validation parity
Every migrated test matched the original Tosca validation results.
"Same coverage, in a language we already use, running on the pipeline we already trust. The licence-cost recovery is the headline. The lower maintenance burden is the part that actually compounds."
John Smith
Engineering leader I North American enterprise client
How we differ
There are open-source parsers and AI coding assistant DIY paths. There are consulting firms quoting fourteen-week rewrites. Here is where Minuscule Migrate sits on that spectrum.
Reads .tsu exports
Application DOM intelligence
Self-healing on DOM drift
Validation oracle (Excel / DB parity)
Enterprise-scale track record
Typical engagement
Open-source TSU parser
Basic parser
Generic POM only
No
No
Hobby projects
You run it yourself
AI coding assistant (DIY)
You describe tests by hand
You teach it every time
Prompt-by-prompt
You build it
Toy demos
You drive everything
Consulting rewrite
Manual reading
Depends on consultant
Hand-fix per release
Custom per project
Variable quality
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Minuscule Migrate
Full structured pipeline
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
Learning fed back into generation
Built-in
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
Basic parser
You describe tests by hand
Manual reading
Full structured pipeline
Generic POM only
You teach it every time
Depends on consultant
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
No
Prompt-by-prompt
Hand-fix per release
Learning fed back into generation
No
You build it
Custom per project
Built-in
Hobby projects
Toy demos
Variable quality
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
You run it yourself
You drive everything
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
Basic parser
You describe tests by hand
Manual reading
Full structured pipeline
Generic POM only
You teach it every time
Depends on consultant
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
No
Prompt-by-prompt
Hand-fix per release
Learning fed back into generation
No
You build it
Custom per project
Built-in
Hobby projects
Toy demos
Variable quality
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
You run it yourself
You drive everything
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
A free 30-minute assessment. Share a representative sample of your existing automation ideally something complex rather than a trivial smoke test, and we walk through what the modernised output would look like, what the timeline would be, and what your three-year cost picture shifts to. No slide deck. No pitch. Just the output.
