An AI-assisted migration framework
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working Playwright
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working Playwright project with Page Object Model
test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
Your existing
.tsu
exports go in. A working
Playwright project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
project with Page Object Model, test data, and full coverage comes out. Proven on a 40,000-step enterprise flow. Built and supported by Minuscule Technologies.
~40,000
Tosca steps migrated
Proven at enterprise scale
90%+
Reduction in Rewrite Effort
Save weeks of engineering time
100%
Playwright Compatible
Modern, maintainable, future ready
Why teams are migrating
Mid-size deployments routinely spend €40,000–€100,000 per year on Tricentis Tosca licences alone. As teams expand and pipelines modernise, the cost-benefit math has shifted. These are the four pressures we hear from QA leaders every week.
Rising License Costs
Tosca licensing costs can increase as teams grow, making automation harder to scale cost-effectively.
High Maintenance Effort
Frequent application changes require manual test updates, slowing QA cycles.
Vendor Lock-In
Tosca tests stay within a proprietary platform, limiting flexibility and portability.
Limited Talent Availability
Skilled Tosca professionals are harder to find, increasing hiring and training challenges.
What changes on day one
We don't ask you to install anything inside your Tosca environment. You export the .tsu file the same way you already do, hand it to us, and the pipeline does the rest — with two human checkpoints to keep you in control.
What changes on day one
The point of migration isn't novelty — it's predictable cost, engineering velocity, and a stack that matches the rest of your modern tooling. Here's what actually shifts.
Before - Tosca centric
Vendor-locked, per-seat, hand-maintained
Tests live inside Tosca Commander readable only to licensed users
Every DOM change means manual hand-edits across modules
No native CI/CD — you build adapters, you maintain adapters
Per-named-user licences scale linearly with team size
Hiring pool narrows every year
After - Playwright + AI
Code in Git, runs in CI, fixes itself
Test suite is plain code in your own GitHub repository
Self-healing AI handles DOM drift; engineers sign off on RCAs
Native CI/CD — runs on every PR like any other build
Open-source runtime no per-seat licence dependency
Hiring pool is the entire modern QA market
A real migration, at real scale
A North American enterprise asked us to convert their most complex flow first a multi-module Salesforce leasing test with ten chained modules. We did, in four weeks, with full validation parity.
~40,000
Tosca steps migrated
Successfully converted large-scale Tosca automation suites to Playwright
10/10
Modules passing
All modules migrated and validated with complete test coverage.
4 weeks
End-to-end delivery
From migration to execution-ready Playwright tests in just four weeks.
100%
Validation parity
Every migrated test matched the original Tosca validation results.
"Same coverage, in a language we already use, running on the pipeline we already trust. The licence-cost recovery is the headline. The lower maintenance burden is the part that actually compounds."
John Smith
Engineering leader I North American enterprise client
How we differ
There are open-source TSU parsers and AI-coding-assistant DIY paths. There are consulting firms quoting fourteen-week rewrites. Here's where Minuscule Migrate sits on that spectrum.
Reads .tsu exports
Application DOM intelligence
Self-healing on DOM drift
Validation oracle (Excel / DB parity)
Enterprise-scale track record
Typical engagement
Open-source TSU parser
Basic parser
Generic POM only
No
No
Hobby projects
You run it yourself
AI coding assistant (DIY)
You describe tests by hand
You teach it every time
Prompt-by-prompt
You build it
Toy demos
You drive everything
Consulting rewrite
Manual reading
Depends on consultant
Hand-fix per release
Custom per project
Variable quality
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Minuscule Migrate
Full structured pipeline
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
Learning fed back into generation
Built-in
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
Basic parser
You describe tests by hand
Manual reading
Full structured pipeline
Generic POM only
You teach it every time
Depends on consultant
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
No
Prompt-by-prompt
Hand-fix per release
Learning fed back into generation
No
You build it
Custom per project
Built-in
Hobby projects
Toy demos
Variable quality
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
You run it yourself
You drive everything
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
Basic parser
You describe tests by hand
Manual reading
Full structured pipeline
Depends on consultant
You teach it every time
Generic POM only
Salesforce, Yardi, SAP, Tableau, Snowflake
No
Prompt-by-prompt
Hand-fix per release
Learning fed back into generation
No
You build it
Custom per project
Built-in
Toy demos
Hobby projects
Variable quality
40K-step Salesforce flow, 10 modules
You run it yourself
You drive everything
14+ weeks, $45K+ quoted
Days to weeks per test, complexity-priced
A free 30-minute assessment. You bring one Tosca test export — ideally a representative one, not a trivial smoke test. We walk through what the pipeline would produce, what the timeline would look like, and what your three-year cost shift looks like. No deck, no pitch.
